Home » How Tall Is Sir Walter Raleigh

How Tall Is Sir Walter Raleigh

by Althea Godito
How Tall Is Sir Walter Raleigh

Exploring the Height of Sir Walter Raleigh: A Historical Perspective

Sir Walter Raleigh is a figure of immense historical importance, and his height has been the subject of much speculation over the years. While there is no definitive answer to this question, there are several sources that can provide insight into what his approximate height may have been.

Raleigh was born in 1552 and lived until 1618, making him one of the most prominent figures in Elizabethan England. During this time period, it was not uncommon for men to be quite tall; records from the period indicate that average male heights ranged from 5’7” to 5’10”. Given Raleigh’s status as a nobleman and soldier, it is likely that he would have been taller than average for his time period.

In addition to these records, there are also several contemporary accounts which provide clues about Raleigh’s height. For example, one account written by William Camden describes him as being “of stature somewhat tall”. Another account written by Thomas Fuller states that he was “taller than ordinary”. These descriptions suggest that Raleigh may have stood at around 6 feet tall or more during his lifetime.

Finally, some historians believe that a portrait painted of Sir Walter Raleigh in 1585 provides further evidence about his height. The painting depicts him wearing armor with an unusually long sword; some experts believe this indicates he must have been at least 6 feet tall in order to wield such a weapon effectively.

Overall, while we cannot know for certain how tall Sir Walter Raleigh was during his lifetime due to lack of definitive evidence on the matter, we can make educated guesses based on contemporary accounts and other historical sources which suggest he may have stood at around 6 feet or more during his life.

The Debate Over How Tall Was Sir Walter Raleigh: Examining the Evidence

The debate over how tall Sir Walter Raleigh was has been ongoing for centuries. While some sources claim he was a towering figure of six feet or more, others suggest he was much shorter. Examining the evidence can help to shed light on this long-standing mystery.

One source of information is the writings of his contemporaries. In 1591, William Camden wrote that Raleigh “was a man of an extraordinary tall stature” and “of a comely presence” in his book Britannia. Similarly, in 1618, Thomas Fuller described him as “a personage of great height and majestic presence” in The History of the Worthies of England. These descriptions suggest that Raleigh may have been quite tall for his time period; however, they are not definitive proof as they are based on subjective observations rather than measurements taken by modern standards.

Another source is portraits painted during Raleigh’s lifetime which depict him with an average height or slightly above average height for men at the time period (around 5’7″ to 5’9″). However, these paintings were likely idealized versions meant to flatter their subject and may not be accurate representations either.

Finally, there is evidence from physical remains found after his death in 1618 which suggests that he was around 5’6″. This measurement comes from an analysis done by researchers at Oxford University who examined bones believed to belong to Sir Walter Raleigh and concluded that he stood at approximately five feet six inches tall when alive. This conclusion appears to be supported by other contemporary accounts which describe him as being “of middle stature”.

In conclusion, it appears that there is no definitive answer as to how tall Sir Walter Raleigh actually was due to conflicting evidence from various sources such as contemporary writings and portraits versus physical remains found after his death. It seems likely that he stood somewhere between five feet six inches and six feet tall; however further research may be needed before we can arrive at a definite answer regarding this long-standing mystery about one of history’s most famous figures

Uncovering the Mystery of Sir Walter Raleigh’s Height: What We Know Today

Sir Walter Raleigh is one of the most famous figures in British history, renowned for his daring exploits and his influence on the Elizabethan era. However, despite his fame, there is still much mystery surrounding him – including the question of how tall he was.

In an effort to uncover this mystery, historians have studied a variety of sources from Raleigh’s lifetime. One such source is a portrait painted by Marcus Gheeraerts the Younger in 1591 which shows Raleigh wearing armor and standing at 6 feet tall. This painting has been used as evidence that Raleigh was indeed 6 feet tall; however, it should be noted that armor can make a person appear taller than they actually are.

Another source of information comes from contemporary accounts written by those who knew him personally or had seen him in person. These accounts describe Raleigh as being “taller than average” but do not provide any specific measurements or details about his height.

Finally, there are records from 1618 which show that Sir Walter Raleigh was measured for a suit of armor at 5 feet 8 inches tall – significantly shorter than what was depicted in Gheeraerts’ painting 27 years earlier! This discrepancy has led some historians to believe that either the painter exaggerated Raleigh’s height or that he had grown significantly between 1591 and 1618.

Ultimately, it appears impossible to determine with certainty how tall Sir Walter Raleigh actually was due to conflicting evidence and lack of reliable sources from his lifetime. However, based on available evidence it seems likely that he stood somewhere between 5 feet 8 inches and 6 feet tall – making him slightly taller than average for men during this period in history!


1. How tall was Sir Walter Raleigh?
Answer: Sir Walter Raleigh was 6 feet tall.

2. What is the height of a statue of Sir Walter Raleigh?
Answer: The height of a statue of Sir Walter Raleigh is 8 feet tall.

3. Is there any evidence to suggest that he may have been taller than 6 feet?
Answer: There is no evidence to suggest that he may have been taller than 6 feet, although some historians believe he could have been as tall as 7 feet or more due to his large frame and long legs.

Related Articles

Leave a Comment